Comments on: ‘Windows XP Or Lower’ Message Box Fallback for TaskDialog in Windows API Code Pack http://goneale.com/2009/09/22/windows-xp-or-lower-message-box-fallback-for-taskdialog-in-windows-api-code-pack/ Graham O'Neale – Deep In .NET Development: ASP.NET, MVC, jQuery, WPF, WCF, Silverlight Wed, 28 Sep 2011 23:00:45 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 By: Graham O'Neale http://goneale.com/2009/09/22/windows-xp-or-lower-message-box-fallback-for-taskdialog-in-windows-api-code-pack/comment-page-1/#comment-3748 Graham O'Neale Sat, 07 Nov 2009 00:21:09 +0000 http://goneale.com/?p=909#comment-3748 Hmm, well I did mean <code>System.Windows.Forms.IWin32Window</code> as I was targetting Win Forms. But if <code>Interop.IWin32Window</code> works for WPF go ahead. :) Hmm, well I did mean System.Windows.Forms.IWin32Window as I was targetting Win Forms. But if Interop.IWin32Window works for WPF go ahead. :)

]]> By: Mark http://goneale.com/2009/09/22/windows-xp-or-lower-message-box-fallback-for-taskdialog-in-windows-api-code-pack/comment-page-1/#comment-3730 Mark Fri, 06 Nov 2009 13:55:45 +0000 http://goneale.com/?p=909#comment-3730 Do you mean for the IWin32Window to be a 'System.Windows.Interop.IWin32Window' or a 'System.Windows.Forms.IWin32Window'? Because the standard MessageBox methods require the second, yet my WPF app's window is the first. (fyi, I'm running on XP) Do you mean for the IWin32Window to be a ‘System.Windows.Interop.IWin32Window’ or a ‘System.Windows.Forms.IWin32Window’? Because the standard MessageBox methods require the second, yet my WPF app’s window is the first.

(fyi, I’m running on XP)

]]> By: Graham O'Neale http://goneale.com/2009/09/22/windows-xp-or-lower-message-box-fallback-for-taskdialog-in-windows-api-code-pack/comment-page-1/#comment-2934 Graham O'Neale Sat, 03 Oct 2009 06:22:10 +0000 http://goneale.com/?p=909#comment-2934 Thanks, that's a good way of doing it. That will teach me for assuming my code works instead of thoroughly testing it :) I have updated the sample with a slight streamline on your concept! Thanks, that’s a good way of doing it. That will teach me for assuming my code works instead of thoroughly testing it :)

I have updated the sample with a slight streamline on your concept!

]]> By: Duncan Cooper http://goneale.com/2009/09/22/windows-xp-or-lower-message-box-fallback-for-taskdialog-in-windows-api-code-pack/comment-page-1/#comment-2780 Duncan Cooper Fri, 25 Sep 2009 15:46:00 +0000 http://goneale.com/?p=909#comment-2780 Nice, this can come in handy :mrgreen: Small bug though; This syntax will always return false: if(buttons == TaskDialogStandardButtons.Yes && buttons == TaskDialogStandardButtons.No) perhaps replace it with something like this if (((buttons & TaskDialogStandardButtons.Yes) == TaskDialogStandardButtons.Yes) && ((buttons & TaskDialogStandardButtons.No) == TaskDialogStandardButtons.No)) Nice, this can come in handy :mrgreen:

Small bug though; This syntax will always return false:
if(buttons == TaskDialogStandardButtons.Yes && buttons == TaskDialogStandardButtons.No)
perhaps replace it with something like this
if (((buttons & TaskDialogStandardButtons.Yes) == TaskDialogStandardButtons.Yes) && ((buttons & TaskDialogStandardButtons.No) == TaskDialogStandardButtons.No))

]]>